Glass Ceiling Effect on Women at Work Places- myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theGlass Ceiling Effect on Women at Work Places. Answer: Introduction Glass ceiling effect is an invisible situation that exists to bar females and minors in workplaces from rising to higher ranks. An inferiority complex is imposed on the aforementioned parties thus regarding them of little or no use to greater plans in the proceedings of the organizations in which they are instituted. This vice extends even to our current 21st century across the globe (Cotter, Hermsen, Ovadia Vanneman, 2001). This term came to be used in the 1980s because of women who joined organizations workforce being turned down towards advancing their career to a certain degree. This in return yielded to the unmotivated female workforce in relation to males. It was viewed that in the event that females would conceive, they were going to take long maternal leaves thus disabling the progress of the firm (Mancuso, 2017). For an organization to achieve its agenda, it requires a committed and productive labor force, thus their absenteeism would halt some organizations plans. When they would report to work from their leave, some would leave the job completely while others would result in low commitment in work due to their maternal obligations. Forms of Discrimination Sexual harassment prevails in workplace whereby it mainly affects those women who hold positions as managers. Most organizations will only rebuke the offender and to an extreme, he is usually fired. Rare cases exist where the offender will be fired for he is stilled perceived as an important asset to the company based on his labour productivity. This inflicts fear on women who play victim since no action is taken upon their offenders. Reporting only brings embarrassment to themselves where fellow workers acquire a topic to joke about (Mancuso, 2017). Boy clubs also affect to a great degree the number of women getting promoted in their career. Either many men will want to promote fellow men whom they schooled together or were former colleagues at a lower level. A result to this is an exclusion of women from business trips and policy formulations without considerations on their qualifications and abilities (Cotter, Hermsen, Ovadia Vanneman, 2001). Job segregation occurs whereby some jobs are regarded manly while others feminine. A job like secretarial is often advocated for women whereby people dont want to hire men for the same. Females will consider these womanly jobs rather than secure a slightly higher caliber job since they wouldnt be acquired leadership positions due to their gender (Newman, 2016). There exist no regulations by the Supreme Court that may adamantly protect women from discrimination (Casadevall, 2015). Womens cases of harassment and discrimination are usually not taken seriously by their superiors who are men. These superiors view these complaints as of lesser weight compared to how women present them. Some even go to an extent of defending the offenders hence creating a scenario where women tend to be wasting their breath. Discrimination may also occur whereby other people may be paid higher salaries than their counterparts concerning gender may or disability may (Dreher, 2003). People who are disabled tend to be viewed as unproductive, which acts a clouded judgment. Strategies towards Empowering Women in Workplaces Implementation of Flexible Family Care Spending. Grant-making institutions allow their grantees to spend some of their grant money to finance for eldercare, childcare or other expenses related to their families so as to encourage traveling to give lectures or even attend conferences and scientific meetings. This policy is gender-neutral and it encourages corresponding grantees a chance to attend courses and conferences, which are essential to the advancement of their career. The IWISE Working Group avows the existence of significant legal and administrative challenges towards implementation of the aforementioned spending. For instance, complications for institutions and investigators must be considered by organizations in relation to laws on income taxes. Regardless of this negativity, they believe that the benefits associated with this flexible spending outmatch its cost of adoption. They thus encourage funders in biomedical research to avail childcare spending within the award budgets of their grantees (Johnson, Smith Wang, 2017 ). Recruit Gender Balanced Committees When considering symposia, conveners and funders should adopt recruitment policies upon selecting a committee which is gender balanced. According to Casadevall 2015, there exists a correlation between a high proportion of participants invited who are females and the presence of at least a woman on scientific Symposiums speaker selection committee. Withdrawal by a female from the committee should require her to recommending three females able to do reviews according to IWISE. They further postulate that a committee should comprise of 20% females. The women indeed happen to be more committed to this task. Incorporation of Implicit Bias Statements. In accordance with previous studies, gender biasedness have been found to exist throughout the society especially in the field of science (Mahr, Hayes, Shanafelt, Sloan Erie, 2017). In order to curb the negative impact of prejudices, unconscious attitude and biasedness, developers of the grants should incorporate into their external review processes program the implicit bias statements. These implicit statements outline the bias to the reviewers for reiteration on the commitment to gender equality by the institution where women should be treated as equals to men. Creation of New Opportunities. In the case of businesses changes, companies should not just wait for male employees to come and fill into the new task. Women who have inspiration on leadership should be incorporated into the system. Given the example of assigning a new director, the organization should increase the number of women seats in the board rather than wait for a man to step down from the board of directors of the company to assign a woman (Belasen, 2017). Encouraging Sponsorships and Mentorships. Companies should encourage all its employees, including women, to find sponsors and mentors who provide them with inspiration towards the advancement of their careers. Mentors will help them contemplate on their career development while sponsors actualize their ideas (Klein, Voskuhl, Segal, Dittel, Lane, Bethea Piccio, 2017). Provide a Network of Support. Organizations should encompass boards to advise women on an enhancement of their career opportunities and entertain both local and national approaches that do support, retain, advance and reward women. This is an effective method to empowering women and challenging them to produce more and effective results in their various fields at their workplace (Belasen, 2017). Measurement of Progress. This aspect entails the evaluation of the productivity of the labour force as a whole. Both women and men are evaluated equally without any gender favor or bias. Companies can consider attributes like attrition, talent acquisition, leadership and career progression. Awarding those with high productivity, a promotion not only brings about equity but also benefits the output of the firm at large (Shafiq, 2014). Advocate for Others Belasen 2017, argued that female leaders should be vigilant in supporting their fellow women in the workplace. Advocating for others creates a conducive environment whereby views and ideas of all employees are listened to in equivalence. Personal advocacy would mean selfishness and violation of the female gender norms whereas considering others is a sense of being nursing and helpful. The breaking of the Glass Ceiling A report submitted by Fortune Magazine dated July 2014 established that there were 51 women CEOs employed in Fortune 1000 companies whereby out of the 51, twenty-four were heads to 500 top companies (Bertrand, Black, Jensen Muney, 2014). Despite these figures seeming worthless, it remains to be quite encouraging to see women stepping up to managerial levels. This trend is an evidence of Glass Ceiling effect but the 5% remains to be an encouraging figure towards breaking of this glass ceiling. The study further discovered that these companies generated a 7% of the total profits of the Fortune 1000 companies. Examples of these companies ran by women are Home Shopping Network, Xerox, and General Motors. The fact that less than a half of these women hold MBAs makes the actualization of being a female CEO achievable. It follows that a great number of women in these Fortune 1000 companies are married mothers thus bringing a picture that women can balance their career and family. They are therefore not open to bias and discrimination (Galam, 2017). An Example of Glass Ceiling in Politics Hillary Clinton advocated for the breaking of glass ceiling in women during her campaign in 2016 to become president. Her official nomination made history in that she became the first woman to vie for the presidency in the United States of America. This nominated paved a path to be followed by women in future assuring them of the possibility of being elected president. As she served as the first lady to her husband in 1995, an event occurred where Walmart banned a t-shirt that showed a character Margaret from Dennis the Menace animated series claiming Someday a woman will be president! in regard that family values were being violated. What resulted in the incidence was complaints that led them to order and selling thirty thousand shirts globally with the same sticker (Cicci, 2015). Conclusion Overall, breakage of Glass Ceiling will come from personal efforts of all female employees. Just as their male coworkers, they should be vigilant to a similar proportion (or even more) for them to be treated with equality. They should consider taking an extra assignment, which will improve their job credibility. Being part of the managerial network creates a responsible attitude such that considerations for promotion become possible. Working in a female-owned company exposes one to some grant programs, which are beneficial to women in particular. References Belasen, A. T. (2017): Exploring Perceptions of Women in Leadership.Marq. L. Rev.,100, 1233. Bertrand, M., Black, S. E., Jensen, S., Lleras-Muney, A. (2014).Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labor market outcomes in Norway(No. w20256). National Bureau of Economic Research. Casadevall, A. (2015). Achieving speaker gender equity at the American Society for Microbiology General Meeting.MBio,6(4), e01146-15. Cicci, M. A. (2015).Turning the page: Fandoms, multimodality, and the transformation of the" comic book" superhero. Wayne State University. Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect.Social forces,80(2), 655-681. Dreher, G. F. (2003). Breaking the glass ceiling: The effects of sex ratios and work-life programs on female leadership at the top.Human Relations,56(5), 541-562. Galam, S. (2017). Marine Le Pen can breach her glass ceiling: The drastic effect of differentiated abstention.arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04643. Johnson, C. S., Smith, P. K., Wang, C. (2017). Sage on the Stage: Womens Representation at an Academic Conference.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,43(4), 493-507. Klein, R. S., Voskuhl, R., Segal, B. M., Dittel, B. N., Lane, T. E., Bethea, J. R., ... Piccio, L. (2017). Speaking out about gender imbalance in invited speakers improves diversity.Nature immunology,18(5), 475. Mahr, M. A., Hayes, S. N., Shanafelt, T. D., Sloan, J. A., Erie, J. C. (2017, June). Gender differences in physician service provision using Medicare claims data. InMayo Clinic Proceedings(Vol. 92, No. 6, pp. 870-880). Elsevier. Mancuso, R. J. (2017).Leadership: A Mixed-Method Case Study to Explore the Behaviors a Consultancy Firm Managing Partner Uses to Create Meaning in Their Leadershipfor Themselves and Their Followersthrough Character, Relationships, Inspiration, Vision, and Wisdom(Doctoral dissertation, Brandman University). Newman, B. J. (2016). Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Local Gender?Based Earnings Inequality and Women's Belief in the American Dream.American Journal of Political Science,60(4), 1006-1025. Shafiq, F. (2014). Glass ceiling effect: A focus on Pakistani women.IJSR,3(1), 136-9.